Discovered in a spotlight display in 2007, we now have the first case of a high cloud Ounasvaara arc. The halo came up in a big display that Leesa Brown photographed in Kissimmee, Florida, on 23 April this year. She took about 1200 photos between 18:12 and 19:04 and it's good she didn't stint on film, otherwise the narrow occurrence window for the Ounasvaara arc at 19:00-19:02 might have been missed. It helps also that she photographed wide enough to cover the sky high up beyond the circumzenith arc.
The same goes for the display's Kern arc, which visibility window (at least where you need not to guess whether it is there) was equally short at 18:38-18:39. While Kern arc has been photographed in high clouds a handful of times, this is only the second time that it is intense enough to appear in single images.
The display had also Lowitz arcs curving down from both Parry arcs, a highly unusual combo. Normally we see from Parry-Lowitz oriented crystals only the Lowitz arc associated with uppercave Parry arc, that is, the upper Lowitz arc. Sightings of the one associated with the uppervex Parry arc, the circular Lowitz arc, are very few. Actually, should anyone know such observations, it would be nice to hear.
The two Lowitz arcs curving down from their Parry arcs show up nice here. In the cza region there is some stitch misalignment. File: 42 DSC_7666_stitch-1And then there is an exemplary 46° contact arc straight above the sun. More often 46° contact arcs are seen in diamond dust, high cloud cases are very rarely encountered.
All and all, this display in Kissimmee on 23 April ranks among the top photographed high cloud halo complexes. Its uniformity and celestial span might have been a bit compromised, but the conglomerie of high rarities makes up for it.
We asked Leesa to give her first hand impressions of the display, here is what she wrote:
On Friday, April 23 2021, I had been out all day with a friend, doing
some nature photography. I kept seeing a lovely 22 degree halo, and bits
of other interesting sky phenomena, and snapped photos of them between
watching birds and other wildlife.
I got home around 6:00 pm, and
all I wanted to do was sit down and rest. But there was a halo and a
lovely display going on outside, so I did what any sky-loving
photographer would do - I dropped my stuff inside the door, and went
back outside to capture whatever I could.
When I'm photographing
displays like the one I saw that Friday night, my one overriding
feeling is always the same - wanting to turn to someone and say "Do you
SEE that??"
That's why I'm so happy to have found some of the
people I've met online since that day. My friends and family like the
photos of displays like these, but they don't truly understand the joy
of finding new arcs you've never seen before, or the beauty of seeing
these in person.
Birders call your first sighting of a particular species of bird a "lifer."
This display turned out to be more than that for me - probably a once in a lifetime event.
And
now, with the help of Marko Riikonen, Alec Jones, and a few others, I
can finally turn to the people reading this and say "Do you SEE that?"
I'm glad there's someone there to see it this time.
Thank you!
All Leesa's photos and the panoramas she made are in Google Drive should anyone like to take a look:
https://drive.google.com/
Color versions of the three panoramas above, plus one more panorama, are at the end of the post. The helic arc, which is largely lost in the b-r images, shows up nice in these versions. Also, the Kern arc can be discerned.
A single image from the Ounasvaara arc stage, worked by Alec Jones using DStretch software.
Finally, above is a simulation for the display's Ounasvaara arc stage. Two Parry
populations were needed to get it right. Ounasvaara arc needs triangular crystals, but such crystals make only uppervex Parry, not
uppercave Parry. So, another population of slightly tabular crystals was
necessary to summon up the latter. It is a bit strange combination of
Parry populations and probably does not reflect the full truth as the
unevenness of high clouds likely complicates things here. Arrows from
top down: Kern arc, Ounasvaara arc, 46° contact arc, upper Lowitz arc
and circular Lowitz arc.
The simulation was done with Samuli Vuorinen's Haloray software and then turned into b-r. There was a problem with the Parry halo intensities in the software, which is why the right side arm of the Ounasvaara arc is brighter than the left. Now I just heard from Vuorinen the bug has been fixed. The parameters are displayed below in the HaloPoint user interface as Haloray doesn't come with such at-a-glance view.
Addendum on 9 May 2021
The Kissimmee display just gets bigger. Reima Eresmaa spotted from the Kern arc stage panorama (28 DSC_7359b_stitch-2) also Hastings and Wegener arcs. Below is shown the single photo (DSC_7377) containing those arcs, compared to a simulation. Subhelic arc would be expected as well in this massive display and the white stripe under the Wegener arc looks like a potential candidate. But the otherwise pretty well matching simulation does not support this: the stripe is too high up in the photo. So unless I have made a mistake in correlating the simulation and the photo, it must be regarded as a wispy cloud strand. Sun elevation for the Haloray simulation is 16 degrees. Alec Jones enhanced the photo.
Hastings arc is always a great catch, probably no more than half a dozen high cloud cases are known.
Reima Eresmaa has worked a simulation that gives a good match with all halos, including subhelic arc. His simulation with the photo is added below. See more in comments.
Congratulations to Leesa! This display indeed is one of the greatest ones. One more thing to add perhaps, what do you think of the possibility of Wegener/Hastings/both at the Kern stage on the left side of the frame? High cloud Hastings would be another rather special feature in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteAs for earlier cases of the Lowitz arc tangent to upper sunvex Parry, there was one observation of mine in Berkshire UK back in 2012. I actually used that as an example in my 2017 post on halo simulation methodology.
http://thehalovault.blogspot.com/2017/07/halo-simulation-using-single-ice.html?m=1
Thank you Reima! And I appreciate your help on Twitter.
DeleteWell, you likely are right that there is Wegener and Hastings there! The location seems to fit. The display just gets more bigger.
ReplyDeleteAnd thanks for reminding of your great Lowitz display. Can't believe this was not active in my head. I seem to recall a third display from somewhere US. An old display, it appeared on some site discussing chemtrails. Possibly a forum.
I looked at the single photo in the upper left corner of the stitch where Wegener and Hastings appear to be. Seems like they are really there:
ReplyDeletehttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1tQcdHoRUgrXoW6PoFYT-IpFg2hOLm4UH/view?usp=sharing
The two upper arrows mark the Hastings and Wegener. The lowest arrow marks a possible subhelic arc, though I couldn't get a match with simulation, even when varying sun elevation. So could be cloud or just my ineptness.
Actually, as the exif time stamp for photos was clearly wrong (for the last photos the sun would have been 2 degrees below horizon) I assumed that the camera time was one hour off. With that the two Parry arc locations were a good match, but quess it should still be checked from the camera.
Leesa here. Yeah, my camera was still on Daylight Saving Time. Missed that until the next day. Sorry! Time of display was roughly 6 pm to 7:30 pm. (I'm away from home so can't give exact times.)
ReplyDeleteI helped ID some of the halos in this amazing display
ReplyDeleteThank you! :)
Delete(Leesa here)
I added to the end of the post the Hastings/Wegener arc photo.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Marko! (Leesa)
DeleteI think the case is not closed regarding subhelic arc. This is what I get when running HaloPoint 2.0:
ReplyDeletehttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1AlfG81cEa4YnVQdB140lCzeGrp75icH7/view?usp=sharing
It's still not 100% match but close enough in my opinion. It could surely be made even better if someone wants to put some more time into it. The parameters I used are at
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OiivJGfKgrAl5Sizgpva0MJ7SWT4B0Cy/view?usp=sharing
Thanks, Reima!
DeleteGood work, Eresmaa. It really made no sense subhelic would be missing. I played quite a lot in trying to get it all match, tried even different sun elevations.
ReplyDeleteThis is incredible that wegener and Hastings is in this display. I tell ya folks this display just keeps on giving. I myself got some pyramidal halos last week
ReplyDeleteI wonder what was going on in the antihelic area during all of this. The 5th image here is a full-sky simulation, but it does show a very nice Tricker arc, diffuse arcs, and a few other things I can't name. This display really does keep on giving.
ReplyDeleteSubanthelic arc must have been close here. In high clouds it was maybe seen in the 10 March 1920 Kuusankoski display, but that's pretty much it. There is as yet no photographed case. Given that we already have several Hastings arcs in high clouds, it's a bit surprising even. So, the international race is on. Who will get it first?
ReplyDeleteCongrats to Leesa for such a monumental display! And thanks Marko for the great analysis and write up. Can't wait to see other rare halos photographed in high clouds.
ReplyDeleteI didn't do so well on Leesa's photos. They were rather dark, so I just added more brilliance by using the HDR in Photoshop. But that made the colors rather nauseating. If someone from the Chinese community would be interested to rework those photos, that would be most welcome. Whoever of the Chinese wizards worked the Siziwang Qi and Jutland display photos, did an awesome job.
ReplyDelete