The several past winters in the Czech Republic were very sub-par. Lots of work and not enough negative NAO resulted in bad conditions across the country.
Since another winter season is behind the door, I wanted to get ready a bit and started looking at older pictures to prepare me for what's ahead.
A quick look at an older diamond dust display from the beginning of 2019 left me speechless. I have found not only Moilanen, but also a possible Mikkilä arc (do we call it that?) as well. Sadly, the display was changing very rapidly and stacking proved to be non helpful. My wide lens is also at the end of its life, resulting in lots and lots of artifacts that makes discerning any low-vis arcs very hard.
Below is an unsharp-masked photo of the arc in question:
Tried my best at background substraction. Both arcs are nicely visible at the final image.
ReplyDeletehttps://imgur.com/a/KpSgTNr
Hi Matěj, Great catch, well done! Could you give a rough estimate of how long this arc lasted? Is there any chance you could share some of these images in the sequence so that others in the group could take a look at them? Many thanks!
ReplyDeleteHey there Alec, the arc lasted approximately 15 minutes.
DeleteHere are the raw (.NEF) files, you're all free to do anything with it!
The password is: halovault2022
https://ulozto.cz/tamhle/SMAvVGrGafHL#!ZJH5AwR2ZmAzMGt5ATRjLwEzLGZkZ0kVMzSMq25HJTEBAwN3ZD==
The sharing site is in Czech, feel free to contact me if you're having any troubles downloading the files.
Matěj (Blogspot still has issues with keeping me logged in, that's why I'm commenting as anonymous)
Yeah, this is "Mikkilä arc" there. It is there when the Moilanen arc has taken some distance to the light source. I don't know if there are actually cases where it wouldn't be. That would call for calculating moon elevation in observations.
ReplyDeleteIn Taivaanvahti this is named Mikkilä arc. But it is yet another case of Finns naming halos after Finns, which is not a proper practise. A person name is an honour that should come from the outside. It could conceivably be Moilanen arc + something, but then Moilanen didn't discover this, so I don't know if that would be right either. In any case I don't think international naming need to follow what's in Taivaanvahti.
That was M. Riikonen commenting
DeleteI agree. While it is nice to know who published what first, we might be better off to let the names emerge (in time) as they may. So long as it is not a name that was not the first one to publish.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete